tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6617063.post4393219154842024308..comments2023-10-09T12:51:06.029-03:00Comments on RGM Unlimited: Feeding the TrollsRGMhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03094054083065645879noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6617063.post-18000019664288558712010-06-01T20:35:56.409-03:002010-06-01T20:35:56.409-03:00Jack Layton's track record more than speaks fo...Jack Layton's track record more than speaks for itself - if I'm going to be pumping out 250-word or less blogs I just go with the natural assumption that my readers know about his lengthy history, thus sparing me the joy of listing such wonderful ideas of his as labeling of the multinational 3D effort in Afghanistan as "George Bush's war." But you know all of this.RGMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03094054083065645879noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6617063.post-73771145589293024392010-06-01T20:04:45.548-03:002010-06-01T20:04:45.548-03:00this is very funny rhetoric against Layton without...this is very funny rhetoric against Layton without a drop of evidence or statement about what is objectionable other than perhaps his name?<br /><br />I mean you don;t even provide evidence for that.<br /><br />Calling this a screed would elevate it unjustly methinks.<br /><br />Liberals for Layton!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6617063.post-471775438216322732010-06-01T17:34:58.901-03:002010-06-01T17:34:58.901-03:00"Ignatieff has detailed his vision for Canada..."Ignatieff has detailed his vision for Canada in his book - yet we never hear that. "<br /><br />Then there's obviously a message problem.<br /><br />p.s. When a poll says that a coalition led by Ignatieff would lose but one led by Layton would win, I say there's not a problem with the product; there's a problem with the salesman.<br /><br />My 2 cents.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6617063.post-14796100668831634882010-06-01T17:22:10.341-03:002010-06-01T17:22:10.341-03:00liberal.ca would be your starting point to find ou...liberal.ca would be your starting point to find out party policy positions. One would think that a good card-carrying member would know that.<br /><br />Is "ilk" such a horrible perjorative in your eyes that it must not be used to describe a group of people that think very differently from the Liberal Party? Is that truly the starting point for Liberals to "get somewhere" RGMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03094054083065645879noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6617063.post-48410394293355232352010-06-01T16:50:51.217-03:002010-06-01T16:50:51.217-03:00What does the LPC stand for exactly?
What's t...What does the LPC stand for exactly?<br /><br />What's the LPC economic policy?<br />Education policy?<br />Health care policy?<br />Sustainable development policy?<br />Environmental policy?<br /><br />Perhaps just start by not referring to others as "ilk" and our party can start getting somewhere!<br /><br />Why don't you post policies the party should adopt? God knows they Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com